Monday, July 14, 2008

Why Obama is Afraid of a Denver Roll Call


Craig Crawford reminds us of the fact we can't forget -- super-delegates, or party elites, were the deciders of the Democratic primary. Like a lot of folks, Craig Crawford is dwelling on the hopeful fact that super-delegates are allowed to change their minds. And they might do so at the Convention in Denver.

Has Donna Brazile quit yet?

There was a time months ago -- when Hillary Rodham Clinton led the Democratic nomination race -- that party superdelegates were the bad guys according to the rhetoric coming out of Barack Obama's camp. Obama supporters trashed the unelected, automatic and unpledged delegates as undemocratic autocrats when it looked as though they might put Clinton over the top. Not anymore.

With the dust settled on the primary season, one thing is clear: Obama is the presumed nominee thanks only to superdelegates. He never did win enough pledged delegates to reach the winning number, falling about 350 votes short. His expected victory stems from beating Clinton among superdelegates 463-257, according to a tally on Real Clear Politics.

All the more reason for Obama to make sure that there is no roll call including Clinton's name on the ballot at the national convention -- which a few die hard fans of the former First Lady are still clamoring for.

Why highlight just how close the Democratic contest really was? And there is certainly no gain for Obama in dwelling on how he had to depend on superdelegates to win the nomination.

Clinton Diehards Want Convention Vote
Call to Hillary Supporters: Take Action on Saturday, July 19