Thursday, October 04, 2007

Strange Justice


Strange Justice Thomas, I mean. You’d have to be strange to bring up the subject of Hill v. Thomas, after all these years, when there is so much evidence that supports Anita Hill and damns you, Clarence Thomas.

Ruth Marcus at the WaPo has a nice summary of said evidence, which to this day remains an indictment of the men who believed him, not her, and so put the Creep on the Court.

Ruth Marcus:

"To read Clarence Thomas's book is to be struck anew by the blast-furnace of his anger -- at Democrats; at liberal interest groups; at the media; at, of course, Anita Hill. There are wounds that never heal, but, for most, time tends to at least salve the injury. Not for Thomas, even 16 years later. The 289 pages of "My Grandfather's Son" pulsate with Thomas's rage." Read more