Thursday, January 31, 2008

Hillary v. Obama Face-Off in California Democratic Presidential Debate


Hillary and Obama face off tonight in the Democratic Debate at the Kodak Center in Hollywood, and it's being billed as Hotter Than the Oscars!

This is the last Democratic Debate before Super Tuesday and the first debate which will feature a match between 'the last Democrats still standing:' Hillary Rodham Clinton v. Barack Obama.

A woman versus an African American competing for the job of President of the USA. What an historic event!

CNN makes the debate sound like the The Super Bowl Debate or the World Championship Boxing Match.


ABC's Jake Tapper Is an Illiterate Journalist Who Lies About Bill Clinton


Here's a perfect example of why it is dangerous to believe anything you hear from the mainstream media, especially if it involves the evil ways of the Clintons. Always, it's wise to do some research to make certain that the outrageous 'fact' you just read did not come from a 'journalist' as brain-dead or biased against the Clintons as Jake Tapper.

Either Jake Tapper, senior national correspondent at ABC (!), hates Bill Clinton and so willfully lies about him, or Jake Tapper is a moron who is an embarrassment to ABC News and the discipline of journalism.

Jake Tapper states that Bill Clinton said: “We just have to slow down our economy and cut back our greenhouse gas emissions ’cause we have to save the planet for our grandchildren.”

Yet further down on Jake Tapper's website, we find the transcript of what Bill Clinton actually said:

And maybe America, and Europe, and Japan, and Canada — the rich counties — would say, ‘OK, we just have to slow down our economy and cut back our greenhouse gas emissions ’cause we have to save the planet for our grandchildren. We could do that.

“But if we did that, you know as well as I do, China and India and Indonesia and Vietnam and Mexico and Brazil and the Ukraine, and all the other countries will never agree to stay poor to save the planet for our grandchildren. The only way we can do this is if we get back in the world’s fight against global warming and prove it is good economics that we will create more jobs to build a sustainable economy that saves the planet for our children and grandchildren. It is the only way it will work."

Tapper titled his manufactured story: Bill: “We Just Have to Slow Down Our Economy” to Fight Global Warming. I've been staring at the lying headline over at memeorandum all day. Gawd only knows how many news organizations, blogs, Obamamanians and anti-Clinton charlatans have picked up the story. You may well see it on Clinton-hating MSNBC later tonight.

Mainstream media morons like Tapper pull this crap all the time. Many mainstream 'journalists' couldn't pass an undergrad journalism course if their life depended on it simply because the first requirement is reading comprehension.

Sadly, No! has the story: Depressingly stupid goddamn journalism

Nashville Debate Watch Party for Hillary


Nashville Debate Watch Party for Hillary
Sportsman's Grille In-Village
1601 21st Avenue South; Nashville, TN 37212
Thursday, January 31st; 6:30 PM

To RSVP, please call the Nashville Headquarters at 615-254-2200 or email
Michelle at mbensignor@hillaryclinton.com.

Tennessee for Hillary

Obama's Support for Rumsfeld and Bush (Video)


Obama's latest negative attack on Sen. Hillary Clinton distorts her record and paints her as the always-wrong candidate, while presenting himself as the candidate who was right on day one.

It's a testimony to the power of charm, or emotion, that Obama can get away with calling himself 'the unity candidate' while creating division in the Democratic Party by using RNC talking points against Hillary Clinton.

Obama, the unity candidate, can get away with the claim that he has better judgment than Hillary on the war and everything else, for now, largely because we know so little about him. Barack Obama continues to be the darling of the corporate media and his supporters are so swept away by the charm, charisma, and love that they really don't want to hear anything about all the times that Obama was wrong. Or all the times that Obama was right merely because he didn't vote.

Folks, it's getting awfully late in the primary season to know so little about a man who may be our nominee.

Today the candidate who advertises himself as the unity candidate asserts:

It's not enough to say you'll be ready from Day One — you have to be right from Day One.

In 2001, the candidate who for good reason continues to lose the liberal vote (52-34) to Hillary Clinton was, um, so very very wrong:



"I dont think that soon-to-be-Secretary Rumsfeld is in any way out of the mainstream of American political life. And I would argue that the same would be true for the vast majority of the Bush nominees, and I give him credit for that." -- Barack Obama, 2001

There can be no doubt that the RNC is happily doing the media's job and already they know more about Obama than we do.

My apologies to my friends who are Obama supporters, but I am wary of candidates who claim to be above politics as usual while employing RNC talking points and who claim to be uniters, not dividers, while overtly creating division -- on the left. But most of all, I am alarmed at how little we know about Barack Obama.



John McCain is Surprisingly Liberal (Video)

And the campaign to stop John McCain and save Mitt Romney before Tsunami Tuesday is on! Like Rush Limbaugh says, if McCain gets the nomination, it will mean the end of the Republican Party as we know it! Bring it on!

Robert Novak has even joined the anti McCain campaign with the nasty allegation that John McCain once made the liberal assertion that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is too conservative! Horrors! Citizens United is doing its part with the above ad. The conservative group has made a "six-figure" ad buy on FOX News "comparing McCain to Hillary Clinton," and calling McCain "surprisingly liberal."

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Nader Launches 2008 Presidential Exploratory Committee


Gawd. Not again.

Please.

The Nader 2008 Presidential Exploratory Committee

Ralph Nader Flirts with Presidential Bid: Former independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader said in an interview Wednesday that he will launch another presidential bid if he's convinced he can raise enough money to appear on the vast majority of state ballots this fall.

The Snub Continued (Video)


Everybody's talking about Obama and "The Snub," again. People are saying that Obama will say anything to get elected. So, of course, people are saying that Obama lied about snubbing Hillary.

Obama said that he turned away when Hillary approached him only because Claire McCaskill asked him a question. But according to the photographic evidence, at that "precise moment" Claire McCaskill was clapping her hands, her mouth was closed, and she was, um, looking at Hillary.

First there was the snide snub at the debate. I cringed when Obama talked down to Senator Clinton like he was some insufferably snotty teenager: "You're likable enough, Hillary."

Then there was the SOTU snub. And now we learn of "The Snub" Before "The Snub":

Senior Obama staffers rejected proposal for their candidate to sit with Clinton at State of the Union. Leading Democrats wanted rivals to sit together for the sake of party unity.

Clinton was willing, but Obama chose to sit with newly-minted supporter Ted Kennedy.

Obama strategist David Axelrod to The Page: “No such invitation ever came from Senator Clinton. Had [she] made such a proposal, we would have adjusted our plans.”


Inside Edition on the Obama Snub


Photos of The Snub
Obama Snubs Hillary at SOTU

Edwards is Dropping Out


John Edwards will announce the end of his bid for the presidency this afternoon in New Orleans. Uh-oh. That means there will be only two in Thursday night's debate. And I think we all know who the kick-ass debater is.

DENVER (AP) -- Democrat John Edwards is exiting the presidential race Wednesday, ending a scrappy underdog bid in which he steered his rivals toward progressive ideals while grappling with family hardship that roused voter's sympathies but never diverted his campaign, The Associated Press has learned. via The Swamp

Update:
Edwards told ABC News' David Muir that that he was willing to continue a dialogue with Clinton and Obama about what they plan to do going forward in their campaigns. He would not say which candidate he would endorse, if any.

Obama's Undemocratic Position: Screw Florida & Michigan Voters (Video)


On ABC's This Week, January 27, 2008, Barack Obama argues for the disenfranchisement of Michigan and Florida voters, some 2 million voters!

Hillary Wins Big in Florida, MSNBC Pundits Despair: The Florida and Michigan delegates will, of course, be seated because this is the Democratic Party not the Authoritarian Party. Otherwise some 2 million voters would be disenfranchised.

Hillary Wins Big in Florida, MSNBC Pundits Despair


MSNBC pundits Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann tried hard not to notice, but Hillary Rodham Clinton won big in Florida. The petulant boys cable news channel took the memo from the Obama camp seriously. They blocked incoming Democratic results for most of the night. When they did report the results, they did so in vague terms like, 'Senator Clinton won the most votes, oh dear.' Not one time did the boy pundits mention that Hillary beat Obama by 17 points.

The MSNBC crew is so biased against Hillary Clinton that I am embarrassed for them. I turned over to CNN to get away from the drama. They're like 12 year olds who think girls have cooties.

Hillary Vows to Fight to Get Florida Delegates Seated

Hillary won big in Florida and promised to fight to get Florida’s delegation seated at the Democratic convention. The MSNBC boy's club and the Obama camp are dead set against that because Obama's welfare is more important than counting the votes of Floridians. Not exactly a great argument to make if you hope to win votes in Florida in the general, but Obamanians are making it anyway.

In the words of souvarine: "Those damn Clintons! Insisting that every vote be counted! The nerve! What about the rules?"

The Florida and Michigan delegates will, of course, be seated because this is the Democratic Party not the Authoritarian Party. Otherwise some 2 million voters would be disenfranchised! And why in the world would Dems want to risk alienating all those Democratic voters and cede the states to the Republicans? To please Obama?

Expect to hear a lot of media whining about Senator Clinton's visit to Florida after the polls closed and about her promise to get the delegates seated. Meanwhile, Obama violated the pledge not to campaign in Florida when he made a national ad buy that saturated the Florida market with his 'liberal/conservative America' ad. And that's not the first time Saint Obama violated the rules.

But don't hold your breath waiting for the brain-dead pundits on the cable news channels to stop whining about girls who have cooties long enough to mention Obama's violations.

Women Voters Turn Out in Droves

There's something about this election that is turning women out in droves. Duh. The Democratic turnout in Florida was 59% female, and 41% male!

Hillary won 54% of the women, Obama got a pitiful 31%, and 13% went with Edwards. Of the men, Hillary won again with 42% to Obama's 38% and Edwards' 17%. And she won in all age groups and that includes an impressive 59% of voters age 65 and older.

With 95% of the precincts reporting:

Clinton 835,848 (50%)
Obama 555,292 (33%)
Edwards 243,332 (14%)

Hillary will be on the David Letterman Show the day before the Feb. 5 Tsunami Tuesday.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Romney, McCain Deadlocked in Florida


Update #2: McCain Wins. Guiliani to drop out and endorse McCain. Update #1: Surprise, problems at the Florida polls:
Voters told there was no Democratic primary.

Today's Florida primary will very likely tell us which Republican will be forced to compete with our formidable Democratic candidate. And whether that candidate be Hillary or Obama, if there is any justice left in this world the general will be a runaway victory for the Democrats.

Romney or McCain? As they tell it, they are both flaming liberals. And everybody knows Giuliani is too liberal for the GOP base. Does this mean that 527's will be running ads against the 'ultra liberal' Republican in the general? Myself, I'm rooting for flip-flopping liberal Romney. Poor liberal Giuliani doesn't stand a chance, according to the latest poll numbers: Polls.

Obama Snubs Hillary at SOTU


Jeralyn at TalkLeft: The unity candidate unmasked.

AP: (Photo --J. Scott Applewhite) . . . . . Clinton, clad in scarlet, crossed the aisle between their seats on the House floor and reached out a hand to greet Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, the Democratic icon whose endorsement she had courted only to lose it to Obama. Kennedy shook her hand while Obama, wearing a dark suit and standing between the two, turned away. . . .

Taylor Marsh: Evidently, Hillary Clinton is not "likable enough" after all.

The Swamp: [Obama] went out of his way to greet as many House members as possible and walked halfway across the chamber to greet members of the Supreme Court, the president's cabinet, the military joint chiefs. That made what happened next even more striking. Obama returned to stand by his seat next to Sen. Edward Kennedy who endorsed Obama today in a widely watched event that reverberated across the political world.

As Clinton approached, Kennedy made sure to make eye contact and indicated he wanted to shake her hand. Clinton leaned towards Kennedy over a row of seats and Kennedy leaned in towards her. They shook hands.

Obama stood icily staring at Clinton during this, then turned his back and stepped a few feet away. Kennedy may've wanted to make peace with Clinton but Obama clearly wanted no part of that. The sense in the press gallery was that Obama didn't cover himself in glory. Someone even used the word "childish."


Pamela Leavey at Democratic Daily: Mr Unity Turns His Back on Opponent and Then Shakes the Hand of The Divider.

BAC at Yikes: It would appear that the "uniter" is not quite ready to ... well ... unite.

susanhu at MyDD: Obama was all smiles while he was chatting it up with George Bush before the SOTU (Photo).

Washington Times: When Mr. Bush entered the House chamber at 9:05, Mrs. Clinton stopped clapping after a few moments. Mr. Obama, however, clapped for almost the entire four minutes that Mr. Bush took to walk down the aisle.

WaPo: In other handshaking news, Bush shook Obama's hand after the speech but not Clinton's.

Darrell Prows at Dem Daily: What Obama seems to me to be on the verge of creating is an expectation among political newbie’s (of whatever age) that he can actually get something significant done quickly and the Republicans tonight just flipped him a giant finger. Instead, he creates the image that political trench warfare is going to resemble a picnic basket, checkered ground cloth, and a wildflower meadow. To me that borders on false advertising and likely breeds the seeds of its own failure.

Monday, January 28, 2008

New York NOW Slams Ted Kennedy for Betrayal!


We have been here so very many times. Men know best, always the men should be in charge. Progressive men thrived off the support of feminists during the Second Wave and then supported every cause except feminism. They did the same in the 19th century. Yeah, it feels like betrayal, again. The New York National Organization for Women (NOW) slams Ted Kennedy as yet another betrayer who has jumped on the traditional women and children last bandwagon:

“Women have just experienced the ultimate betrayal. Senator Kennedy’s endorsement of Hillary Clinton’s opponent in the Democratic presidential primary campaign has really hit women hard. Women have forgiven Kennedy, stuck up for him, stood by him, hushed the fact that he was late in his support of Title IX, the ERA, the Family Leave and Medical Act to name a few. Women have buried their anger that his support for the compromises in No Child Left Behind and the Medicare bogus drug benefit brought us the passage of these flawed bills. We have thanked him for his ardent support of many civil rights bills, BUT women are always waiting in the wings.

“And now the greatest betrayal! We are repaid with his abandonment! He’s picked the new guy over us. He’s joined the list of progressive white men who can’t or won’t handle the prospect of a woman president who is Hillary Clinton (they will of course say they support a woman president, just not “this” one). ‘They’ are Howard Dean and Jim Dean (Yup! That’s Howard’s brother) who run DFA (that’s the group and list from the Dean campaign that we women helped start and grow). They are Alternet, Progressive Democrats of America, democrats.com, Kucinich lovers and all the other groups that take women’s money, say they’ll do feminist and women’s rights issues one of these days, and conveniently forget to mention women and children when they talk about poverty or human needs or America’s future or whatever.

“This latest move by Kennedy, is so telling about the status of and respect for women’s rights, women’s voices, women’s equality, women’s authority and our ability – indeed, our obligation - to promote and earn and deserve and elect, unabashedly, a President that is the first woman after centuries of men who ‘know what’s best for us.’”

Kennedy Family Divided On Support for Hillary & Obama


Like progressives and Democrats across the nation, the Kennedy family is divided when it comes to choosing the candidate they judge to be best for America. Rep. Patrick Kennedy, Ted Kennedy and Caroline Kennedy endorsed Obama today.

There's no doubt about it, getting the endorsement of liberal lion and longtime partisan Ted Kennedy is quite a feat for Obama.

Lefty hero and leading environmental activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is supporting Hillary Clinton. And Kerry Kennedy, Anthony Kennedy Shriver and Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, a former lieutenant governor in Maryland and a daughter of Robert F. Kennedy, have all announced that they support Hillary Clinton.

More at Gay Socialite

Jesus Endorses Obama


The King of Kings to endorse Obama on Tuesday at a rally in Branson. Critics play down the value of the endorsement.

Chief Clinton strategist Mark Penn . . compare[d] the Son of God unfavorably to Senator John Kerry's unsuccessful bid for the White House in 2004.


"Look, it doesn't surprise me that Jesus and Kerry have both decided to join the Obama camp," said Penn. "In 2004, Kerry didn't fight back against the swift boating, and Jesus didn't fight back against the Romans when they crucified him. You can expect the same response from Obama when the right wing smear machine gets going. Senator Clinton is the only candidate with the proven track record of fighting back."

via DU

Krugman: Lessons of 1992 Or Obama's Post-Partisan Narrative



Paul Krugman weighs in on Obama's wishful post-partisan narrative or the absurd argument that Hillary and Bill Clinton are to blame for the culture war:

It’s starting to feel a bit like 1992 again. A Bush is in the White House, the economy is a mess, and there’s a candidate who, in the view of a number of observers, is running on a message of hope, of moving past partisan differences, that resembles Bill Clinton’s campaign 16 years ago.

Now, I’m not sure that’s a fair characterization of the 1992 Clinton campaign, which had a strong streak of populism, beginning with a speech in which Mr. Clinton described the 1980s as a “gilded age of greed.” Still, to the extent that Barack Obama 2008 does sound like Bill Clinton 1992, here’s my question: Has everyone forgotten what happened after the 1992 election?

Let’s review the sad tale, starting with the politics. Whatever hopes people might have had that Mr. Clinton would usher in a new era of national unity were quickly dashed. Within just a few months the country was wracked by the bitter partisanship Mr. Obama has decried.

This bitter partisanship wasn’t the result of anything the Clintons did. Instead, from Day 1 they faced an all-out assault from conservatives determined to use any means at hand to discredit a Democratic president. . .

[T]hose who don’t want to nominate Hillary Clinton because they don’t want to return to the nastiness of the 1990s . . are deluding themselves. Read more

Hillary to Fight Bush's Retroactive Immunity

From Down with Tyranny: HILLARY TO FIGHT BUSH'S RETROACTIVE IMMUNITY-- WHAT ABOUT OBAMA? -- "Hillary will make it her business to be in the Senate so she can vote against Miss McConnell's cloture bill to shut down debate."

UPDATE: OBAMA'S KEEPIN' UP WITH THE JONESES CLINTONS

Sunday, January 27, 2008

The Anti-Hillary Media -OR- The Pervasive, Insidious Sexism of MSNBC, CNN, Etc.


Jessica Reaves at the Chicago Tribune speaks up about the media's fear and loathing (misogyny) of Hillary Rodham Clinton:

In other words, we resorted to every cheap trick in the book. And virtually no one called us on it. Gloria Steinem wrote a blistering Op-Ed on the subject for The New York Times. And several women's groups demanded apologies from Matthews for his numerous idiotic comments. But for the most part, the onslaught has gone unchecked, because women have remained largely silent. . .

Let's go back to those comments -- about Clinton's hair, voice, wardrobe -- and imagine if the tone had been racist rather than sexist, and they had been directed at Obama. I have enough faith in this country to believe that the outcry would have been loud and swift.

Any outcry from Clinton, or on her behalf, regarding the persistently sexist tone of so-called political commentary, has been brushed aside, dismissed as political correctness run amok, or as the whining of feminists (the second-dirtiest word in American politics, just behind "liberal"). . .

Unless John Edwards pulls out an upset of epic proportions, Democrats will put forward a historic candidate in November. And it may be that Clinton will be that candidate, having successfully quieted the pervasive, insidious sexism we have allowed to overwhelm our cultural vocabulary. But it seems more likely that the country will celebrate another, equally inspiring milestone, while conceding a point to Gloria Steinem and Shirley Chisholm: In politics, gender remains a more profound obstacle than race.


The Media And The 2008 Election: The Perfect Storm Of Clinton Hate
Media Bias Against Clintons Borders on Mental Illness
Obama's Sad Victory
The Sexist Media Lynching of Hillary Clinton



Media Bias Against Clintons Borders on Mental Illness


The amount of Clinton bashing in the S.C. primary coverage on MSNBC and CNN last night was astounding. What an amazing phenomenom. I don't recall ever seeing so much overt and shameless media bias in any previous election. I may as well be watching Fox News.

The vicious media bias against all things Clinton -- or against Hillary's bid for the presidency -- is not good for Obama or the Democratic Party. Eventually, the pack will turn on Obama; it's just a matter of time until they discover that he's human too. It may be naïve to think that anyone other than the media picks our candidates.

Craig Crawford is one of the few journalists who is not running with the pack:

"You know, I have sat down here in Florida for the last month. And I have watched the coverage, and I really think the evidence-free bias against the Clintons in the media borders on mental illness. I mean, I think when Dr. Phil gets done with Britney [Spears], he ought to go to Washington and stage an intervention at the National Press Club.

I mean, we've gotten into a situation where if you try to be fair to the Clintons, if you try to be objective, if you try to say, "Well, where's the evidence of racism in the Clinton campaign?" you're accused of being a naïve shill for the Clintons. I mean, I think if somebody came out today and said that Bill Clinton -- if the town drunk in Columbia [South Carolina] came out and said, "Bill Clinton last night was poisoning the drinking water in Obama precincts," the media would say, "Ah, there goes Clinton again. You can't trust him." I really think it's a problem. You know what? You guys make him stronger with this bashing. This actually is what makes the Clintons stronger."
-- read more

Vote for the worst political pundit over at TalkLeft.

"It is simply no longer possible to ignore the strangeness of our public discourse."
--Al Gore, Assault on Reason

Nashville: Hillary Congratulates Obama & Says 'We Have Only Just Begun' (Video)


Nashville: Sen. Hillary Clinton congratulated Sen. Barack Obama on his primary win in South Carolina, and observed that the campaign has only just begun. She said now 'the eyes of the country turn to Tennessee' and toward Tsunami Tuesday. [Transcript]

Speaking at Nashville's Historically Black Tennessee State University (TSU), Hillary Clinton promised to "push for universal health care, affordable college education, universal pre-kindergarten, a fairer tax code, restored respect for America in the world and an end to the Iraq war." Senator Clinton is in Memphis this morning and "will appear on CBS's Face the Nation from Memphis before attending services at Monumental Baptist Church."

Hillary Clinton at Tennessee State University

Hillary has a very large lead in most of the Tsunami Tuesday races (polls) -- and that includes Tennessee. [More state polls] The question is whether Obama's South Carolina win can change voters' preferences across the nation. Exit Polls here.

Marc Ambinder notes: "South Carolina and Iowa were the two retail states where Obama's campaign worked the hardest and spent the most, and Obama was able to build movements in those states. But it took months. He can't replicate these organizations in 22 states in 9 days. . Hillary Clinton is running strong in states like Tennessee, Missouri and Arkansas -- all interior states -- and is stronger in the states with the most delegates. . Including Florida and Michigan, more Democrats have voted for HRC than any other candidate by far."

Saturday, January 26, 2008

The Dirty Little Secret About Democrats


Quote of the Day

"[O]ne of Hillary Clinton's greatest assets in the eyes of Democrats [is] that she's a fighter. . [I]sn't the dirty little secret about Democrats that we actually do want someone, finally, who will do whatever it takes? . . Umm excuse me, has there been a correlation over the past 2 cycles between playing nice and winning the White House that I'm unaware of?"
--Todd Beeton, Mr. Nice Guy

Links: When Does the Election take a Day Off?


Digby: This Is Not That Rough A Democratic Primary

MyDD: Mr. Nice-Guy

Robert Novak: Attorney General Edwards?


Matt Stoller: South Carolina in the Bag?

Pollster.com: South Carolina: Why So Much Variation?


Big Tent Democrat: South Carolina Whites Are Not Moving Away From Obama

Politico: Clinton pursues selective strategy in S.C.

Talkleft: Obama And Edwards Are On The FL Ballot Too

Huffington Post: Senator Bill Nelson, D-FL, Will Endorse Hillary Clinton

Gail Collins: FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla.-- Heeere’s Rudy!

Today in Godbaggery


by MzNicky

My friend Cathy called me last week to say she was on her way from Kingsport to Knoxville to help her daughter Meghan find a different hospital for the imminent birth of Meghan's third child. Why would she want to do that, I asked? "Because," Cathy replied, "Meghan wants to have her tubes tied after the baby's birth, and now that St. Mary's has taken over Baptist Women's Hospital, they no longer provide tubal ligations."

"Whoa, whoa," I said. "That can't be right. It's right there in the name: 'Hospital for Women.' It's not possible they're refusing to do a tubal ligation at a hospital intended specifically for women!"

Not only it is entirely possible, it's true. According St. Mary's spokesperson Debra London, quoted in today's Knoxville News-Sentinel, the procedure is "at odds with Roman Catholic beliefs." Thus, now that St. Mary's Health System has merged with Baptist, this and other services are no longer available for women at any hospital within the Baptist Health System.

Of course, a St. Mary's patient has never had the option of tubal ligation, unless she might die without it and the system's patriarchal bureaucracy decided to relent. And now, that antediluvian misogynistic godbaggery has spread to K-town's Baptist system as well! Way to send women's health care in Knoxville back about half a century or so, guys! Thanks ever so!

While noting that tubals after childbirth were performed on about 9 percent of Baptist Hospital for Women's patients last year, London, obviously focused on what's most important, dismissed those patients as a "component of our business [that] is negligible. We feel this is not an issue because these services are available elsewhere in the community." In other words, like my friend's daughter, nearly 10 percent of women giving birth at the west Knoxville facility are now being told to make sure the door doesn't hit 'em in the ass when they leave.

By the way, the infertility and reproductive work that was being done at Baptist is also out; Der Popenführer no likey that stuff, either. Anna Roberts, office manager for that now-ejected program, observed: "We understand the restrictions they have on their guidelines. We respect where they stand on their issues."

Really? Why?

By the way, Meghan, her new baby boy, and her newly ligated tubes are fine and doing well—just not Baptist West. Meanwhile, I now have to find a new gynecologist, one who's not affiliated with this ghastly new unholy alliance. Wish me luck.

Join Hillary in Nashville Tonight


Hillary Clinton will be in Nashville tonight!

Join Hillary for a "Solutions for the American Economy" Town Hall.

When: Saturday, January 26, 2008 at 8:00 PM - 10:00 PM

Tennessee State University Kean Hall – Gymnasium
3500 John A. Merritt Blvd.
Nashville, TN 37209

Join Hillary at Tennessee State University in Nashville for a Town Hall discussion about the economy.

Tennessee For Hillary, 615-254-2200

Click here to RSVP for the Nashville Town Hall with Hillary!

Friday, January 25, 2008

Everybody But Obama Knew About Rezko (Video)


In an apparent effort to prove that the Clintons are as scummy [tongue-in-cheek] as Obama, right-wing Clinton hater Matt Lauer confronted Hillary Clinton with one of the stock presidential photos of the Clintons and Tony Rezko, on this morning's Today Show. (Scroll down for the video.) You remember Tony Rezko, Sen. Obama's recently indicted 'political patron.'*

Some are wondering if the Obama campaign is behind the sudden appearance of the mysterious undated photo. And is a photo supposed to be the equivalent of Obama's 17 year relationship with slumlord Rezko?

At any rate, Tony Rezko has never contributed a dime to Hillary or Bill Clinton. Obama sorely wishes he could say the same.

Just this morning, Obama did say: "The facts are this: [Rezko] is somebody who was active in politics in Illinois, who I knew. Nobody had any indications that he was engaging in wrongdoing."

Um, nice try, I guess. Actually, at the time Obama got his great and wonderful deal on a house, compliments of the slumlord, freakin' everybody knew about Rezko.

Matt Lauer Confronts Hillary with a Photo! [gasp]


SusanUnPC over at No Quarter says "this video is a must-watch, even though Brian Ross filed the story before the Sun-Times’s revelation that Obama is the “unnamed political candidate” in the Rezko indictment."

Obama and Rezko Sittin' in a Tree

*"As a state senator, Barack Obama wrote letters to city and state officials supporting his political patron Tony Rezko's successful bid to get more than $14 million from taxpayers to build apartments for senior citizens." [Chicago Sun Times, 6/13/07]

New York Times Endorses Hillary Clinton


The New York Times strongly endorses Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. The thoughtful 2-page editorial addresses the strengths and weaknesses of our 3 'inspiring' Democratic candidates.

Among the many noted strengths of Hillary Clinton are "her abiding, powerful intellect" and her proven ability to win over "skeptical voters." What is often forgotten or ignored by critics is that the New York Senator possesses a proven track record of winning over the staunchest of Republicans in upstate New York.

The New York Times judges Senator Clinton thusly:
"We know that she is capable of both uniting and leading." None of this is news to those who have followed Hillary Clinton's career more closely than they have followed right-wing rhetoric and/or the traditional media assaults aimed at all Democratic front-runners. Wisely, in my view, the paper urges Senator Clinton to "take the lead in changing the tone of the campaign."

Both skeptics and supporters should read the full editorial. Here are some of the highlights:

[W]e are hugely impressed by the depth of her knowledge, by the force of her intellect and by the breadth of, yes, her experience. . . [She] has won the respect of world leaders and many in the American military. She would be a strong commander in chief.

She has shown a willingness to learn and change. Her current proposals on health insurance reflect a clear shift from her first, famously disastrous foray into the issue. She has learned that powerful interests cannot simply be left out of the meetings. She understands that all Americans must be covered — but must be allowed to choose their coverage, including keeping their current plans. . .

The potential upside of a great Obama presidency is enticing, but this country faces huge problems, and will no doubt be facing more that we can’t foresee. The next president needs to start immediately on challenges that will require concrete solutions, resolve, and the ability to make government work. Mrs. Clinton is more qualified, right now, to be president.

We opposed President Bush’s decision to invade Iraq and we disagree with Mrs. Clinton’s vote for the resolution on the use of force. That’s not the issue now; it is how the war will be ended. Mrs. Clinton seems not only more aware than Mr. Obama of the consequences of withdrawal, but is already thinking through the diplomatic and military steps that will be required to contain Iraq’s chaos after American troops leave. . .

She is the best choice for the Democratic Party as it tries to regain the White House.

NY Times Trashes Giuliani, Endorses McCain


The New York Times gives lucky John McCain the liberal kiss of death. We're certain that Senator McCain appreciates the endorsement so very very much. He will be the envy of all his conservative buddies. The Times has absolutely nothing good to say about the other neanderthals, and does a super-fine job of trashing 'vindictive' Rudy Giuliani. Too bad Rudy has no chance of getting the nomination because this is a script killer ads are made of:

The real Mr. Giuliani, whom many New Yorkers came to know and mistrust, is a narrow, obsessively secretive, vindictive man who saw no need to limit police power. Racial polarization was as much a legacy of his tenure as the rebirth of Times Square.

Mr. Giuliani’s arrogance and bad judgment are breathtaking. When he claims fiscal prudence, we remember how he ran through surpluses without a thought to the inevitable downturn and bequeathed huge deficits to his successor. He fired Police Commissioner William Bratton, the architect of the drop in crime, because he couldn’t share the limelight. He later gave the job to Bernard Kerik, who has now been indicted on fraud and corruption charges. The Rudolph Giuliani of 2008 first shamelessly turned the horror of 9/11 into a lucrative business, with a secret client list, then exploited his city’s and the country’s nightmare to promote his presidential campaign.

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Obama: Think You're Getting My Voters, Hillary?


[Update: Keith Olbermann video clip: Obama, A Divider, Not a Uniter added below.] In an interview with David Brody over at Pat Robertson's Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN), Barack Obama said:

"I have no doubt that once the nomination contest is over, I will get the people who voted for her. Now the question is can she get the people who voted for me? And I think that describes sort of one of the choices that people have, just a practical choice, as they move forward."

In other words: "I am the man, they eat out of the palm of my hand, I am the greatest, I am Barack Obama...the next Reagan..."

What a freakin' arrogant and potentially damaging-to-the-party thing to say. Why is that, Obama? Are you going to tell your supporters not to vote for Hillary? Oh, wait, you just did.

Well, golly gee, I guess that means I better vote for Obama.

Obama doesn’t mean to suggest that he’s a 'singular' fellow, but he does. Obama doesn’t mean to praise Reagan, but he does. Obama doesn’t mean to suggest that his supporters should not vote for Hillary, but he does.

Any bets on how long it will take before Obama and his supporters insist that he didn't really say that?

We have a pattern here:

1. Obama says something provocative.
2. Obama denies that he ever said it.


Obama doesn’t mean to suggest that he puts himself above the good of the party, but he does.

Olbermann: Obama, A Divider, Not a Uniter

Related post: Obama Flyer: 'You Can Be A Democrat For One Day' - Getting Out the Wingnut Vote!

Hillary v. Obama: War of the Radio Ads

Hillary's Radio Ad: Obama Praised Reagan


Obama's Radio Ad: 'Hillary Will Say Anything'

In response, Obama is broadcasting an ad that calls Hillary a liar -- an ad harsh enough to be picked up by the GOP in the general election. My, how Saint Obama has fallen. Here's the text of Obama's ad.

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Al Gore Endorses Gay Marriage (Video)


Raw Story: "I think that gay men and women ought to have the same rights as heterosexual men and women, to make contracts, to have hospital visiting rights, to join together in marriage," Gore said. "And I don’t understand why it is considered by some people to be a threat to heterosexual marriage to allow it by gays and lesbians. Shouldn’t we be promoting that kind of faithfulness and loyalty to one’s partner regardless of sexual orientation?


Gore hinted that he would come around to support same-sex marriage as early as 2006, when speaking to a group of gay-rights activists, but his latest comments represent Gore's first formal endorsement of equal marriage rights.

The video was posted with little commentary to Current's Web site Jan. 17. It didn't receive much notice at the time, but Wednesday the video was picked up by Politico, Wonkette, The Huffington Post, DailyKos and others.

The 'Fed-Up With the Misogyny' Vote


Citizens United Not Timid or C.U.N.T. is a "527" organization that plans to "Educate the American Public" by selling t-shirts which make the point that Senator Hillary Clinton is a C.U.N.T.

The group includes Roger Stone, "a Republican operative who prides himself as something of an elder statesman of GOP dirty tricks."

Ho-hum, more Republican men boys who don't like Hillary or any other women who aren't their adoring captive sex slaves.

Unfortunately for Republican misogynists like Stone, cunts vote! And never before have we had so very many reasons to so.